When's the last time you played golf? Do you know anyone under 40
who plays regularly?
Those questions haunt the golf industry today. People have quit
playing golf over the last few decades and few people under 30 care to play.
The New York Times sums up the problem quite nicely:
Golf has always reveled in its standards and rich tradition. But increasingly a victim of its own image and hidebound ways, golf has lost five million players in the last decade, according to the National Golf Foundation, with 20 percent of the existing 25 million golfers apt to quit in the next few years.
![]() |
Golf RIP. We Hardly Knew Ye. |
So what does this have to do with the reason for this blog -- My thoughts on wildlife, wildlife policy and about anything else that interests me in the general subject of plants and animals?
Here's the connection. Golf courses are the biggest tracts of undeveloped land remaining in many cities. As courses fail almost all will be eyed by developers as an easy building area. And golf courses are failing regularly. So what to do?
![]() |
More Failures than Openings, Always |
- Running a golf course is a horrible business to be in. If a golf course closes for more than a month it's never coming back no matter what commitments were made to local homeowners.
- Lots of people have claims. Most dying golf courses created since 1980 were built as the centerpiece of subdivision developments. Agreements made when people paid for the house are suddenly null and void. Creditors, shareholders, homeowner associations, developers and individual owners need to have a say. People who pay extra for a view of the fairway are adamant that can't be taken away from them.
- Maintaining the course becomes a problem. Many times this is the developer's biggest weapon to get agreement. People may be angry in the first year that the course isn't maintained, but after a half decade of growth it changes to acceptance. As the homes on the golf courses lose value people become more willing to negotiate anything to restart maintenance.
- Another issue is the neighborhood can do downhill. People may be very anti- development of the golf course in the beginning. But homeless people moving into the clubhouse and meth deals happening in the parking lots tend to make people more susceptible to negotiations. And yes, I've seen both of these happen. And don't forget ATV races on the fairways.
![]() |
Florida Hazard, but only for Baby Boomers |
- The fact that the fairways tend to be long and narrow and snake between housing developments make them pretty worthless for large wildlife preserves. The fairways are also not idea for development since they are long and narrow with no road access in place. However the fairways do make good city parks / green spaces.
![]() |
Fairways Meander Through Subdivision |
So what should you do if you want to influence the next life of a
dead golf course? There may be an opportunity to influence what happens to the
course. But don't think it's going to be easy or quick. Each case is different,
but here are some general guidelines.
- Any development to the golf course will probably have go through the local planning commission (or planning and zoning or whatever it's called there). Make your voice heard. The local planning board hates issues like this and will look hard for a way to make it go away and anything that unites the developer and local residents will get consideration.
- Compromise is the order of the day. In the end the deal will probably be some development around the clubhouse because there's large piece of property with utilities there and some kind of protection for the fairways. That protection may come in the form prepaid maintenance fees from the developer or maybe getting the local city or county to take over park maintenance.
- The golf course is never coming back. Local residents that get in a position that somebody must run the golf course because it was promised are going to be disappointed. This is always hard to get past.
- Time is of the essence. The developer gains strength every year the issue drags on. If nobody is doing maintenance on the buildings or mowing the grass people get more tired of the situation. Anger gives way to acceptance eventually. Sometimes it's better to cut a deal fast than be forced later.
About the best that can be hoped for from a hiker /
naturalist perspective is that a piece of the property is set
aside for a park or some kind of public use. Usually the compromise is the
developer helping with upkeep for some period of time with the homeowner's
association or city taking over that responsibility eventually. For that the
developer is allowed to build on part of the property, usually the central part
around the old clubhouse.
Getting an agreement on the ground makes it easier for the
planning commission to OK new development. Without an agreement on the ground
planners see it more as a dead rat being dropped on their desk. So don't be
afraid to talk to the commission about competing visions of how a golf course
can be repurposed. But also don't be too quick to accept new development
on the old golf course, but ruling it out completely will
probably not work either.
No comments:
Post a Comment